Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 100 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 152 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 5.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 15 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 513 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2015 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 2`178 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |