Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 217 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 10 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.6 - 10.0 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Grandis. On average, a Ford Galaxy with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Grandis. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1545 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Grandis. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |