Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Citroen C8 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 109 - 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 11 - 16.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 7.1 - 11.5 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C8. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller. Ford Galaxy is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C8. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 2`493 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Citroen C8 has
| |