Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Volvo XC70 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Galaxy is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC70 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 2.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 163 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 320 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 8.1 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 7.6 - 11.1 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |