Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Volkswagen Touran 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 9 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 5.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touran. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 25 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`178 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |