Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Ford Galaxy 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Galaxy
2003 - 2006
Ford Galaxy
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.9 - 2.82.0 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 90 - 204 HP130 - 161 HP
Torque: 170 - 310 NM190 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 - 17.2 seconds10.5 - 11.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 11.96.5 - 8.2
Ford Galaxy 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy 2006. On average, Ford Galaxy 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.82 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.73 m1.72 m
Ford Galaxy 2003 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Ford Galaxy 2003 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy 2006, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy 2003 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data390 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy 2003 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy 2006, which means Ford Galaxy 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`940~ 1`768
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 20004400
Pros and Cons: Ford Galaxy has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • lower price
Ford Galaxy has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv