Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy 2006. On average, Ford Galaxy 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2003 is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Galaxy 2003 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy 2006, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy 2003 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy 2003 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy 2006, which means Ford Galaxy 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |