Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Toyota Previa 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 116 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 225 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 11 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 7.2 - 10.8 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Previa. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`227 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |