Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Galaxy is available only with front wheel drive, while Seat Alhambra can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 1`956 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |