Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, a Ford Galaxy with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 13 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`433 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |