Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Galaxy is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 161 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.2 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Galaxy is 19 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 256 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Ford Galaxy has 134 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |