Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 161 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.8 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 5 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2325 litres | 2100 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`460 kg | ~ 2`433 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`680 kg | ~ 1`681 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 780 kg | ~ 752 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford S-Max has
| |