Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 161 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.2 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 5 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
|
Ford S-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 464 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 2`433 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |