Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 161 HP | 95 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 150 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.2 | 4.6 - 6.6 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 44 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Galaxy has 42 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Ford Galaxy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 1`950 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |