Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 203 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.2 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Ford Galaxy has 419 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`486 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |