Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 203 HP | 115 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.2 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 267 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Galaxy has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`486 | ~ 2`343 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |