Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 203 HP | 110 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.2 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Scenic. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 26 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Ford Galaxy has 182 litres more trunk space than the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`486 | ~ 2`136 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |