Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Renault Grand Espace 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 203 HP | 130 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 270 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | 9.7 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.2 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Grand Espace. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Espace, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3050 litres | |
|
Renault Grand Espace has more luggage space. Ford Galaxy has 66 litres less trunk space than the Renault Grand Espace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Espace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`486 | ~ 2`622 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |