Ford Galaxy 2010 vs Renault Espace 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 203 HP | 150 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 270 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | 9.7 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.2 | 6.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Espace. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 16 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 291 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2860 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage capacity. Ford Galaxy has 99 litres more trunk space than the Renault Espace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Espace, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`486 | ~ 2`558 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Renault Espace has
| |