Ford Focus 2011 vs Dacia Duster 2013
Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus and Dacia Duster have the same engine power, but Ford Focus torque is 2 NM more than Dacia Duster. Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dacia Duster 2013: Duster`s 4x4 system is adapted from Nissan Quashqai. It has 2WD, AUTO and LOCK modes which are selectable with a button. In 2WD mode the vehicle is FWD. In AUTO mode, the vehicle is normally FWD, but if wheel slip occurs, the rear wheels are engaged to gain traction. In LOCK mode (available at speeds up to 60km/h), the center differential splits torque 50/50 front/rear. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 25 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford C-Max, Ford Fiesta, Ford B-Max | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.63 m | |
Ford Focus is larger, but lower. Ford Focus is 22 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Focus is 14 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 473 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1636 litres | |
Ford Focus has 2 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.6 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |