Ford Focus 2014 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP120 HP
Torque: 270 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds8.8 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Focus engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 60 NM more than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.85.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Focus consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1390 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1550 km on highway1180 km on highway
1010 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.58 m
Width: 1.86 m1.78 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Ford Focus is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 374 litres419 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Ford Focus has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9001`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 820013 400
Pros and Cons: Ford Focus has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv