Ford Focus 2014 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP120 HP
Torque: 170 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds10.3 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Focus engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.85.6
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Focus consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 630 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1060 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.58 m
Width: 1.86 m1.78 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Ford Focus is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 374 litres419 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Ford Focus has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9001`835
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 820012 200
Pros and Cons: Ford Focus has
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv