Ford Focus 2001 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
Ford Focus engine produces 2 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Despite less power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.1 | |
Ford Focus consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Focus is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Focus is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Ford Focus has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Octavia, so Ford Focus quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |