Ford Focus 1998 vs Fiat Stilo 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 128 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 5 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
740 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Focus engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Fiat Doblo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Stilo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Fiat Stilo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
Ford Focus is smaller. Ford Focus is 3 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Focus is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1210 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |