Ford Focus 2002 vs Ford Focus 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus 2002 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus 2002 engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Focus 2004, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Ford Focus 2004. Thanks to more power Ford Focus 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus 2002 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus 2002 could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus 2002 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Focus 2004 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Focus 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Ford Focus 2002 is smaller. Ford Focus 2002 is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Focus 2004, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Focus 2002 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1210 litres | 1247 litres | |
|
Ford Focus 2004 has more luggage space. Ford Focus 2002 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus 2004. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus 2004 (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus 2002 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Focus 2004, which means Ford Focus 2002 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Ford Focus has
| |