Ford Focus 2004 vs Mazda 3 2004

 
Ford Focus
2004 - 2008
Mazda 3
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP110 HP
Torque: 320 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds11.5 seconds
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Focus engine produces 26 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1270 km on highway
840 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.42 m
Width: 1.84 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Ford Focus is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1247 litres635 litres
Ford Focus has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Focus has 85 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 612 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8751`785
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Ford Focus has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 3, so Ford Focus quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Focus has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv