Ford Focus 2004 vs Kia Cerato 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving. Ford Focus engine produces 28 HP less power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Kia Cerato. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Ford Focus and Kia Cerato are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 228 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1247 litres | 1046 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage capacity. Ford Focus has 157 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 201 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`783 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |