Ford Focus 2014 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 370 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds8.1 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Focus and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Ford Focus torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 3. Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.04.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km5.9 l/100km
By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Focus consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.47 m
Width: 1.86 m1.80 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Ford Focus is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 362 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Ford Focus has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0251`910
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 76007800
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • more dynamic
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv