Ford Focus 2014 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 370 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds9.7 seconds
Ford Focus and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Ford Focus torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 3. Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.8
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway1240 km on highway
850 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.47 m
Width: 1.86 m1.80 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Ford Focus is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 362 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1062 litres1263 litres
Ford Focus has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 201 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`930
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 76007800
Pros and Cons: Ford Focus has
  • more dynamic
Mazda 3 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv