Ford Focus 2014 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Ford Focus and Volvo V60 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1430 km on highway | 1780 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1300 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volvo V60 2013 1.6 engine: The main issues reported by owners are frequent oil and coolant leaks. The Siemens fuel system with piezo injectors is highly sensitive to fuel quality, requiring the use of high-grade diesel to avoid ... More about Volvo V60 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Focus is smaller. Ford Focus is 27 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 362 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1062 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V60 has more luggage space. Ford Focus has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`900 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`336 kg | 1`680 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 564 kg | 430 kg | |
| Ford Focus load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Volvo V60. Therefore, Ford Focus is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |