Ford Focus 2014 vs Mazda 3 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 104 HP | |
Torque: | 159 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 21 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
830 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Ford C-Max | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Ford Focus 2014 1.6 engine: The engine boasts a simple and reliable design.
After 100,000 km, piston knocking is a common issue. Electromagnetic Ti-VCT valves often develop leaks, and high-voltage wires frequently disconnect. The engine ... More about Ford Focus 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Ford Focus is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 362 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1062 litres | 1263 litres | |
Ford Focus has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 201 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6400 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |