Ford Focus 2011 vs Renault Megane 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 50 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max, Ford S-Max | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Ford Focus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Ford Focus 2011 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Focus 2011 2.0 engine Renault Megane 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Focus is 6 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 372 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1162 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`762 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 4200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Renault Megane has
| |