Ford Focus 2011 vs Renault Megane 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 106 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 151 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Ford Focus engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.8 | |
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Focus consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Focus engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 26 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford C-Max, Ford Fiesta, Ford B-Max | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Focus is 6 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 368 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1162 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`720 | |
Safety: | |||
Renault Megane is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Renault Megane has
| |