Ford Focus 2018 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 123 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Ford Focus engine produces 3 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Ford Focus has 34 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |