Ford Focus 2014 vs Volvo V60 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Focus engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo V60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1670 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km with real consumption | 1210 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Focus is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 476 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1502 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Focus has 46 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. The Volvo V60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |