Ford Focus 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 128 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Focus and Volvo V40 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 316 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1215 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Ford Focus has 19 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 1.6 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |