Ford Focus 2014 vs Volvo V60 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Focus engine produces 117 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 12.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time.
In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Focus is smaller. Ford Focus is 27 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Focus is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 316 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1215 litres | 1241 litres | |
|
Volvo V60 has more luggage space. Ford Focus has 114 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V60 (by 26 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V60, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`025 kg | 2`270 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`437 kg | 1`796 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 588 kg | 474 kg | |
| Ford Focus load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Volvo V60. Therefore, Ford Focus is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |