Ford Focus 2014 vs Kia Cerato 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 113 NM more than Kia Cerato. Despite less power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 6.8 | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Focus consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that by driving the Ford Focus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Kia Cerato 2016 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Ford Focus is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 482 litres | |
| Ford Focus has 7 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |