Ford Focus 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 28 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 18 NM less than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Focus consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Focus consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Focus is larger. Ford Focus is 19 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 476 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1502 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage capacity. Ford Focus has 141 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |