Ford Focus 2018 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Ford Focus engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 47 litres | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Megane engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max, Ford EcoSport | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Ford Focus is 1 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Focus is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1354 litres | 1258 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Focus has 27 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. This could mean that the Ford Focus uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 96 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Ford Focus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`826 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Renault Megane has
| |