Ford Focus 2018 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 165 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Ford Focus is more dynamic to drive. Ford Focus engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Nissan Pulsar. Thanks to more power Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 46 litres | |
710 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
Ford Focus and Nissan Pulsar are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 385 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1354 litres | no data | |
Ford Focus has 10 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Focus scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Pulsar is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Focus scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |