Ford Focus 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Focus engine produces 27 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Ford Focus consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Focus 2014 1.6 engine: The engine boasts a simple and reliable design.
After 100,000 km, piston knocking is a common issue. Electromagnetic Ti-VCT valves often develop leaks, and high-voltage wires frequently disconnect. The engine ... More about Ford Focus 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Focus is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 316 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`825 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |
