Ford Focus 2011 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 - 182 HP | 75 - 122 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 340 NM | 112 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 12.6 seconds | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.7 | 3.6 - 5.9 | |
Ford Focus petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Ford Focus equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
Ford Focus is larger. Ford Focus is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Focus has 75 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Ford Focus uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`938 | ~ 1`667 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |