Ford Focus 2011 vs Mazda 3 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 182 HP | 105 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 340 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 12.6 seconds | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.7 | 4.4 - 8.1 | |
|
Ford Focus petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, a Ford Focus with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Ford Focus is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Focus has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`938 | ~ 1`827 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Focus scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |