Ford Focus 2004 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 225 HP | 84 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 320 NM | 122 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 14.1 seconds | 9 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.3 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Ford Focus petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Ford Focus equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Focus is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1247 litres | 878 litres | |
| Ford Focus has 96 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 369 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`775 | ~ 1`728 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |