Ford Focus 2011 vs Mazda 3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 150 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 320 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.4 | 4.3 - 9.6 | |
|
Ford Focus petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Ford Focus equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Ford Focus is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 277 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Ford Focus has 204 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`938 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |