Ford Focus 2018 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 182 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 370 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 13.5 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 5.5 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford Focus petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Ford Focus is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1354 litres | 1334 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`918 kg | ~ 1`857 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`308 kg | ~ 1`296 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 610 kg | ~ 561 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |