Ford Focus 2018 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 182 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 370 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 13.5 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 5.5 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford Focus petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Ford Focus is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1354 litres | 1334 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Focus has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`918 | ~ 1`857 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |