Ford Fiesta 1999 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 55 HP | |
Torque: | 110 NM | 99 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Ford Fiesta engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Despite the higher power, Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.4 | |
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Fiesta consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fiesta could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
680 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Skoda Felicia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.83 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
Ford Fiesta is smaller. Ford Fiesta is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Ford Fiesta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 700 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |