Ford Fiesta 2004 vs Mazda 2 2003

 
Ford Fiesta
2004 - 2005
Mazda 2
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP100 HP
Torque: 146 NM146 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds11.4 seconds
Ford Fiesta and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.57.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fiesta could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway770 km on highway
520 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.92 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Ford Fiesta and Mazda 2 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
945 litres1044 litres
Ford Fiesta has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 99 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`515
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Ford Fiesta has
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv