Ford Fiesta 2003 vs Mazda 2 2003

 
Ford Fiesta
2003 - 2004
Mazda 2
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 70 HP75 HP
Torque: 106 NM110 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.3 seconds15.1 seconds
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Fiesta engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.26.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.2 l/100km
By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Ford Fiesta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway900 km on highway
650 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.92 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Ford Fiesta and Mazda 2 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
945 litres1044 litres
Ford Fiesta has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 99 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`490
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Ford Fiesta has
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv