Ford Fiesta 2005 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2007
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 84 HP | |
Torque: | 106 NM | 114 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Ford Fiesta engine produces 14 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fiesta could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
660 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Ford KA | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Fiesta might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Ford Fiesta engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 4.31 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
Ford Fiesta is smaller. Ford Fiesta is 39 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 284 litres | 375 litres | |
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage space. Ford Fiesta has 91 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |