Ford Fiesta 2012 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is more dynamic to drive. Ford Fiesta engine produces 18 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Ford Fiesta reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Fiesta consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Ford Fiesta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fiesta consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Fiesta is larger. Ford Fiesta is 40 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fiesta is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage capacity. Ford Fiesta has 205 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fiesta is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`125 | 1`495 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Fiesta scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fiesta has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |